Skip to main content

PART 1 - THINGS TO KNOW BEFORE FILING DEFAMATION COMPLAINT

Being aggrieved of the ruthless comments made upon Birbal by Akbar (His Majesty) in front of the entire Darbar, Birbal has decided to file a Defamation Complaint before the Court of Law. (If you feel clueless, read the first paragraph of - PREVIEW OF DEFAMATION COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE ) Also, Birbal is clueless about the legal process, so he approached Me ( Note: this anecdote is fictional, if you have not realized till now). I had to tell him the following information to make him aware about “Defamation Case Procedures in Indian Courts” in exchange of some legal-fee of course: SECTION 499: Defamation is a Criminal offence under Section 499 of Indian Penal Code . This legal provision contains the legal definition of ‘Defamation’, which has to be followed by Courts and the judicial fraternity in order to convict or acquit an Accused person.   Short-Gyan: Did you know that making defamatory comments against a dead individual is also a criminal defamation offence!   PUNISHME...

INTRODUCTION POST FOR SHORTICLE SERIES - "CHEQUE BOUNCE PROCEEDINGS IN INDIAN COURTS"

  INTRODUCTION POST

While the offence of “Cheque Bounce”, in the opinion of the Supreme Court, is a legit “criminal offence” in the skin of a “civil offence” surrounding, however, the phrase “cheque bounce” is a relatable term for many Indian households, either by virtue of them being involved in the offence or maybe their parents/relatives involved in the same, at some or the other point of time.

Having worked on several cheque bounce offences during my small advocacy career (ongoing), I have realized something about the clients belonging to non-legal background. They always tend to have 50% knowledge about the functioning and procedural knowledge of a cheque bounce court proceedings, which is both a vice and a virtue for them.

Through this 2nd Shorticle Series CHEQUE BOUNCE PROCEEDINGS IN INDIAN COURTS, I will make sure that an individual has enough knowledge about the cheque bounce case procedure, so as to minimize the surprise factor during the hearings of his case.

 


 

WHAT THINGS ARE ESSENTIAL TO INITIATE CHEQUE BOUNCE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST SOMEONE:

1.   ORIGINAL DISHONORED CHEQUE: The cheque which you deposited in the bank and got dishonored; and

2.   ORIGINAL CHEQUE-RETURN MEMO: The cheque return memo is a receipt issued by the Bank, when a cheque gets dishonoured/bounced. Such memo is handed over by the Bank to such account holder, in whose favour the cheque was deposited into.

 

WHAT THINGS MAY SUPPORT YOUR CASE (BUT ARE NOT ESSENTIAL) FOR INITIATING CHEQUE BOUNCE PROCEEDINGS:

1.   WRITTEN AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARTIES: Any written Agreement which shows that the Accused has handed over a cheque of so-and-so amount to you towards the “discharge of some debt”. It is important that the debt amount is either similar to the cheque amount, or is more than the cheque amount.

2.   WHATSAPP/EMAIL CONVERSATION SHOWING THE REASON BEHIND ISSUE OF CHEQUE: Whatsapp and/or email conversations between you and the Accused person can add as supporting evidence in your cheque bounce case.

 

It is great if you have the above supporting evidences, or any other evidences, along with the mandatory “Dishonored Cheque” and “Return Memo”.

Usually people feel that in order to evidence a business relationship between the accused and complainant, an Agreement, Stamp Paper etc. is extremely necessary to file a cheque bounce case in Courts, however, that is not true.

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 under Section 118 gives the Complainant a benefit of “Presumption of guilt against the Accused”. In simple terms, section 118 says that if the cheque(s) has bounced, then it must be presumed, without any further evidence, that such cheque was issued to the complainant by the accused towards “discharge of some debt”. However, such presumption can be rebutted by the Accused in future, if he can prove at the time of Evidence stage, that the cheque was issued towards something else and not towards the transaction that the Complainant is claiming in his complaint. At such point of time, the Complainant’s case may fall on the ground.

 

THE ABOVE SITUATIONAL CIRCUMSTANCE IS SHOWN ONLY TO INFORM THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT THE CHEQUE AND THE RETURN MEMO ARE THE ONLY ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING A CHEQUE BOUNCE CASE BEFORE A MAGISTRATE COURT.

 

But, what about the procedure from scratch? What are the steps involved in successfully filing a Cheque Bounce Compliant against an Accused in Magistrate Court?

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NEXT BLOG ON:

WHAT IS THE STEP-BY-STEPPROCEDURE FOR FILING A CHEQUE BOUNCE COMPLAINT AGAINST THE ACCUSED?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Advocate Shreyas Jain, being a legal practitioner based in Mumbai, specializes in Criminal Law and primarily deal with criminal matters placed before Metropolitan Magistrates and Session Courts at Mumbai & Thane. Mr. Jain is a first generation lawyer and believes in working and excelling at the ground level before going big. You may reach him at +91-7054407778 or through his e-mail jainshreyas1995@gmail.com

 

NOTE: VIEWS MENTIONED IN THE ARTICLE ABOVE ARE PERSONAL AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY PERSON, PLACE, ORGANISATION OR ANY OTHER FALLING UNDER THE DEFINITION OF ‘PERSON’ UNDER INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PART 2: PRACTICAL INSIGHTS AND STAGES IN A CHEQUE BOUNCE COMPLAINT

 The content of the last Shorticle, due to its length, had to be cut in two halves. The first half titled " PART 1: PRACTICAL INSIGHTS AND STAGES IN A CHEQUE BOUNCE COMPLAINT " dealt with the procedure uptil THE COURT ISSUING NOTICE AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSON IN ORDER TO MAKE HIM/HER APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT. Now henceforth, the further Stages in a Cheque Bounce Complaint is as follows:     C.    FIRST APPEARANCE OF THE ACCUSED IN COURT This is a very crucial date of hearing for both Accused and Complainant. Let me point out the things that both the parties (Complainant & Accused) must be aware about:   ACCUSED PERSON: POINTS TO BE KEPT IN MIND ON HIS FIRST APPEARANCE DATE POINT 1: Hire a Lawyer and obtain Bail from the Magistrate. This is a Bailable Offence, so you will get Bail easily. POINT 2: Fulfill all the Bail conditions which are imposed on you. Generally, some monetary amount is to be deposited in the Cash Department of the Court. C...

WHAT ARE BAIL CONDITIONS AND HOW TO FULFILL THEM?

This shorticle, being the last-one from the series – “HOW TO INITIATE/DEFEND CRIMINAL ACTION” , focuses on the very last activity that an Accused person has to undergo so as to obtain Bail. QUICK RECAP: 1.    Accused is arrested. 2.    Accused is produced before Magistrate. 3.    Magistrate confirms the same and decides to continue his Police custody. 4.    After some time, Magistrate decides to change the custody from Police custody to Judicial Custody (i.e. in Jail as undertrial prisoner). 5.    Advocate of Accused files a Bail Application before Magistrate. 6.    Magistrate grants Bail to Accused after executing a CERTAIN AMOUNT OF BOND or SURETY , and also imposes certain CONDITIONS . WHAT IS BOND and SURETY & WHAT ARE THESE CONDITIONS: The Judge, while passing a Bail Order directs the Accused person to execute a Bond with or without Sureties for a certain amount of money. To make the above sentence ...

CHARGESHEET FILED BY POLICE WHILE YOU ARE IN POLICE/JUDICIAL CUSTODY: THINGS YOU SHOULD BE AWARE ABOUT

In the last shorticle, I informed you about the sole solution which you need to know in a situation when an accused has been held in custody (police/judicial) by way of an order of the Magistrate. The only solution being – " BAIL " Let us consider an ILLUSTRATION for our better understanding and perspective: Akbar has used his hi-fi contacts to build a false case against Birbal , to charge him under the offence of ‘Attempt to Murder’ under section 307 of IPC.   Akbar in his FIR to Police has mentioned these facts:-   “On 01 st Jan 2020, Akbar went to buy vegetables in the market, Birbal stopped him and hit him hard on his head with the handle-side of a Khukri, and also threatened to kill him, if Akbar denies to handover Rs. 5,000/- to Birbal then and there. However, Akbar pushed Birbal and tried to run from the situation, and in that process, Birbal’s knife pierced the right thigh of Akbar. Then, Birbal ran away.” [NOTE: THIS IS ONLY AKBAR’S SIDE OF STORY]  ...